I read several tutorials how to place 3d objects in SceneKit/ARKit applications and all of them uses .scn format files for the objects.
But I found there is no any issues if I use original .dae format and do not convert it to .scn format.
I don’t really see any difference between .dae and .scn formats.
Actually result seems to me the same but can you explain what the difference between them and what I should use in what cases?
DAE (Digital Asset Exchange, aka Collada) is a vendor-neutral format for 3D assets. It supports a wide range of features that exist in multiple 3D authoring and presentation tools, but not every possible feature in SceneKit. Historically, it was the only asset format for early versions of SceneKit.
SCN format is a serialization of the SceneKit object graph. (There are convenience methods for reading/writing it on
SCNScene, but really it’s the same thing you get by passing an
NSKeyedUnarchiver.) Thus, it by definition supports all features of SceneKit, including physics, constraints, actions, physically based cameras, and shader modifiers.
If you’re using DAE assets, deploying to iOS (or tvOS or watchOS), and not seeing any difference vs using SCN assets, there are two possible reasons:
- Your assets use only those SceneKit features that are available in DAE format.
When deploying to iOS/tvOS/watchOS, Xcode (via
scntool) automatically converts all 3D asset resources to SCN format. (And applies other transformations, like interleaving geometry buffers, for optimal rendering performance on iOS/tvOS/watchOS devices.) The filename in the built app’s Resources directory still has a
.daeextension, but the file contents are the same as SCN format.
(SceneKit running in iOS/tvOS/watchOS actually can’t read DAE, so it relies on this preprocessing by Xcode.)
Answered By – rickster
Answer Checked By – Pedro (BugsFixing Volunteer)