[SOLVED] Efficient way to map 3D function to a meshgrid with NumPy


I have a set of data values for a scalar 3D function, arranged as inputs x,y,z in an array of shape (n,3) and the function values f(x,y,z) in an array of shape (n,).

EDIT: For instance, consider the following simple function

data = np.array([np.arange(n)]*3).T
F = np.linalg.norm(data,axis=1)**2

I would like to convolve this function with a spherical kernel in order to perform a 3D smoothing. The easiest way I found to perform this is to map the function values in a 3D spatial grid and then apply a 3D convolution with the kernel I want.

This works fine, however the part that maps the 3D function to the 3D grid is very slow, as I did not find a way to do it with NumPy only. The code below is my actual implementation, where data is the (n,3) array containing the 3D positions in which the function is evaluated, F is the (n,) array containing the corresponding values of the function and M is the (N,N,N) array that contains the 3D space grid.

step = 0.1

# Create meshgrid
xmin = data[:,0].min()
xmax = data[:,0].max()
ymin = data[:,1].min()
ymax = data[:,1].max()
zmin = data[:,2].min()
zmax = data[:,2].max()

x = np.linspace(xmin,xmax,int((xmax-xmin)/step)+1)
y = np.linspace(ymin,ymax,int((ymax-ymin)/step)+1)
z = np.linspace(zmin,zmax,int((zmax-zmin)/step)+1)

# Build image
M = np.zeros((len(x),len(y),len(z)))

for l in range(len(data)):
    for i in range(len(x)-1):
        if x[i] < data[l,0] < x[i+1]:
            for j in range(len(y)-1):
                if y[j] < data[l,1] < y[j+1]:
                    for k in range(len(z)-1):
                        if z[k] < data[l,2] < z[k+1]:
                            M[i,j,k] = F[l]

Is there a more efficient way to fill a 3D spatial grid with the values of a 3D function ?


For each item of data you’re scanning pixels of cuboid to check if it’s inside. There is an option to skip this scan. You could calculate corresponding indices of these pixels by yourself, for example:

data = np.array([[1, 2, 3], #14 (corner1)
                 [4, 5, 6], #77 (corner2)
                 [2.5, 3.5, 4.5], #38.75 (duplicated pixel)
                 [2.9, 3.9, 4.9], #47.63 (duplicated pixel)
                 [1.5, 2, 3]]) #15.25 (one step up from [1, 2, 3])
step = 0.5                            
data_idx = ((data - data.min(axis=0))//step).astype(int)
M = np.zeros(np.max(data_idx, axis=0) + 1)
x, y, z = data_idx.T
M[x, y, z] = F

Note that only one value of duplicated pixels is being mapped to M.

Answered By – mathfux

Answer Checked By – Terry (BugsFixing Volunteer)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *